Quantcast
Channel: Remote Desktop Services (Terminal Services) forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 21489

Connection Broker vs. NLB?

$
0
0

I currently have three 2008R2 RDSH virtual servers, clustered & using NLB.  They've been extremely stable and performance has been good.  I  need to replace this with a 2012R2 cluster.

As I'm reading about the Connection Broker service in 2012R2, I'm not really sure why I'd want to use it instead of just sticking to NLB?

To avoid a single point of failure, I'd have to add a second Connection Broker server, and that would require a connection to our SQL server.  It seems like it complicates our environment without really buying us anything. 

I could see going that route if I had 10 or 20 RDSH servers in a farm, but even three is overkill for us.  Any thoughts as to why I'd want to rely on the Connection Brokers instead of just sticking with NLB?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 21489

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>